Way Out In Left

Beliefs, Controls, and the Occasional Bologna Sandwich

 
  Home.
 
  Current Entry.
 
  Introduction.
 
  Cast And Crew.
  Credits.
 
  Updates.
  Notes.
  Links.
 
  Comments/Complaints.
  Email.
 
  2010 Archive.
  2009 Archive.
  2008 Archive.
  2007 Archive.
  2006 Archive.

 

<<  Previous Entry

Next Entry  >>

Wednesday January 27 2010.
Haiti Haters?

This has been making the rounds on Facebook lately (a couple of people that I know have cut and pasted it onto their wall):

Shame on you America: the only country where we have homeless without shelter, children going to bed without eating, elderly going without needed meds, and mentally ill without treatment - yet we have a benefit for the people of Haiti on 12 TV stations.

My first reaction was one of mild disgust, but the more I thought about, the more I understood the position (and yeah, maybe the title of this entry is a little over the top). I may not agree with the sentiment, but I think I understand it. Sure, some people may have posted it because they're xenophobic, but I think the majority of people who posted it are making more of a commentary on the state of domestic affairs in the U.S. rather than making a statement about aid to other countries; it's says more about us than it does about them.

However, that being said, the comparison between what we do to help our homeless, hungry, elderly and mentally ill and what we do for other countries is a bit off base (and I won't even bother with the "only country" part--that's false). The Hope for Haiti Now benefit came together because of a catastrophic event, not because of economic conditions or overall standards of living (i.e., homelessness, hunger, etc). And if you look back into our recent past, you'll see that we've had three other major benefits in the past decade and all three were in response to a similar catastrophic event: the tsunami in Asia in 2004, Hurricane Katrina and 9/11. Those events are far better comparisons, but, obviously, such comparisons would put a big hole in the Shame On You America finger-wagging position.

The part of the posting that I do agree with is the implied idea, or rather fact, that we don't do enough for the homeless, the hungry children, the elderly and the mentally ill. And to take that another step, we don't do enough worldwide, let alone do enough for those particular Americans.

So my answer to Shame On You America is this: We should be helping in all cases. Catastrophic. Day-to-day. Home and abroad.

 
 
 

 

  2000-2010